Monday, April 25, 2011

The Mechanic (1972) versus The Mechanic (2011) and the Flattening of our Popular Culture

The Mechanic (1972) is one of my all-time favorite thrillers. It has an enormous amount of depth to it that stays with you in a way that todays treatment of the thriller genre doesn’t.  I count it among those paragons of the seventies’ crime genre, like The Godfather films, The Conversation and The French Connection (1973) and of course Bronson’s other groundbreaking film of the early seventies, Deathwish (1974). All of those films, despite the violence that came to personify them, are literate in a way that their counterparts in this era simply are not.

That sad comparison becomes even more apparent when a remake appears that doesn’t really measure up. I’m talking of course about The Mechanic (2011) with Jason Statham. Take the central character of Arthur Bishop. In the remake, he’s a bit of a cipher. He lives alone in the Louisiana bayous in hidden splendor, where he listens to classical music on an immaculate, old school record player that no one is allowed to touch but him. For recreation, there’s a beautiful call girl that he pays well, and the renovation of a classic sports car that he’s been working on for two years. It’s the fantasy of every adolescent (and possibly middle-aged) male on earth. It’s alluring, this seeming luxury and privilege of a life without commitment but fails to demonstrate the costs that such an existence would exact on the man who’s chosen to live it. 

The Arthur Bishop of the original film however, Bronson’s Bishop, is all costs. The isolated splendor is there, but it comes with a huge emotional toll. He takes what appears to be antidepressants to help him cope with being unable to establish normal friendships with anyone. The loneliness that Bronson’s Mechanic feels is present even during moments when he should be trying to escape it. The prostitute (Bronson’s wife second wife at the time, Jill Ireland) in the original is more than a simple fleshpot, she is a literary hooker, who is valued just as much (perhaps even more so) for her ability to compose beautiful, overwrought love letters designed to make Bishop feel emotionally alive in a way he can’t afford to be when he’s on assignment, than her physical assets. Even his decision to take on the young Stephen McKenna (Jan-Michael Vincent) as a protege is driven by the need to bond with someone and break the closed emotional fishbowl that he’s been living in for so long.  

It is tempting to lay the blame on the filmmakers for the flattening out of Bishop’s character that takes place in the remake. After all, it has long been a conceit, whether true or not that the screenwriters, directors and producers of generations X and Millennial produce far less literate work than their predecessors since they were raised on a steady diet of pop-culture junk food from comic books to kung-fu films. It’s tempting but it would be wrong. The blame really lies with us as a people, as a culture. The sad truth of the matter is that Bronson’s Bishop could never make it to the silver screen in this day and age. There’s just too much detail, too much character development, in short, too much reality for the movie going public to face for it to survive commercially. We’ve become far more interested in adolescent fantasies than the price it asks of the person living it. Sad, but all too true.

2 comments:

  1. Based on the handful of clips I've seen on the second Mechanic I'm sure the original was far superior but not because it is more "literate" but more "cinematic". The original movie opens with a scene that goes on for over 15 minutes without a word of dialogue.

    Your talk about "too much character development" is nonsense. Bronson is the same character at the end of the movie as he is at the beginning.

    Like most book lovers you have no appreciation of the movie medium. You watch a movie and SEE a book.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I know this article is a few years old, but I was sad to see only one comment, and a negative one at that! I felt the same way you did about the differences between the two films, and you're right about them. However I don't think that modern films in general eschew character complexity, just action films.

    There are great dramas nowadays, as good as they've ever been, and while they may not draw huge box office crowds, a dedicated audience watches them at home. But action cinema has taken a nosedive in the last few decades. When I think of movies featuring tough male protagonists, I immediately gravitate to those of the 70s and earlier: The Mechanic, Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia, Bad Day at Black Rock. Those were complex films about protagonists defined by more than their ability to kill coldly and casually.

    At some point, with few exceptions action films stopped being so intelligent, and I'm not sure if the blame lies with the audience or the movie studios. The studio executives are convinced that they know what audiences like, and I'm not sure they're correct. I think that undiscriminating audiences will lap up whatever is put in front of them... there's no reason that stuff can't be good as a bonus.

    ReplyDelete